Detect Deepfakesby Resemble AI
Deepfake case study · Video

AI deepfake election advertising laws vary state by…

The 2026 election cycle has seen a surge in AI-generated deepfake advertisements targeting political figures, prompting varied state-level legislative…

Incident date
Aug 2026
Target
Thomas Massie, Ilhan Omar, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
Updated Aug 9, 2026 · 1 min read

As the 2026 election season progresses, the use of artificial intelligence to generate campaign imagery has sparked widespread debate and legislative action across the United States. While these AI-made advertisements can generate significant public attention, they also pose risks of voter confusion regarding the authenticity of political content.

What happened

Throughout the 2026 cycle, several high-profile deepfake videos have surfaced. Notably, Representative Thomas Massie (R-KY) was the subject of a falsified video depicting him in a "throuple" with Representatives Ilhan Omar (D-MN) and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY). Such instances have highlighted the potential for synthetic media to mislead the electorate.

Because the federal government has not implemented national regulations regarding election-related deepfakes, individual states have intervened. As of late June, 29 states maintain laws regulating AI deepfake videos, following judicial rulings in Hawaii and California that struck down similar measures on First Amendment grounds.

Regulatory approaches vary significantly by jurisdiction. Most states with active legislation mandate that advertising parties include a clear disclosure if an ad contains AI-generated content. Colorado and Utah have implemented stricter requirements, mandating the inclusion of metadata such as the date of creation, the date of editing, and the identity of the creator. Meanwhile, Maryland, Minnesota, and Texas have enacted outright prohibitions on election-related deepfakes. These bans are subject to specific temporal constraints: Texas prohibits such content in the 30 days preceding an election, while Minnesota’s restrictions trigger at the start of the absentee voting period or 90 days before a nominating convention. Maryland’s prohibition remains in effect indefinitely. While federal election-specific regulation remains absent, the "Take It Down Act," signed into law this year, does address the broader issue of harmful deepfakes and revenge pornography.

Sources