detect·deepfakesby Resemble AI
Deepfake law · Mexico

Deepfake Law in Mexico

Mexico's "Olimpia Law" reforms criminalize non-consensual sexual imagery including deepfakes across all 32 states. Federal AI regulation is in development; sector-specific enforcement covers electoral and financial fraud deepfakes.

Status
enacted
Jurisdiction
Mexico
Effective
Jun 2021
Statute
Ley Olimpia (state codes) + Federal Criminal Code reforms 2021
Non-consensual sexual imageryElectoral deepfakes (some states)Financial fraud via deepfake
Updated Apr 16, 2026 · 1 min read

Mexico regulates deepfakes primarily through the "Olimpia Law" (Ley Olimpia) state-level reforms criminalizing non-consensual sexual imagery — including AI-generated imagery — and through federal fraud and electoral provisions.

Key provisions

Ley Olimpia (state codes). Named for Olimpia Coral Melo, whose advocacy drove reform after she was targeted by non-consensual imagery distribution. All 32 Mexican states have now enacted some version of the law. Penalties vary by state but typically range from three to eight years imprisonment for creating or distributing non-consensual sexual imagery, including AI-generated.

Federal Criminal Code (reformed 2021). Criminalized the dissemination of intimate images without consent at the federal level, harmonizing across states. Includes AI-generated imagery of identifiable persons.

INE (National Electoral Institute) regulations. 2024 guidelines require clear labeling of AI-generated political advertising. Non-compliant content can be ordered removed during electoral periods.

Federal Law on Protection of Personal Data. Covers biometric data including voice and facial features. Unauthorized deepfake creation of an identified person implicates this law independently of Criminal Code charges.

Enforcement context

Mexican federal and state prosecutors have used Ley Olimpia provisions actively against non-consensual deepfake creators. The law is often cited as a model in Latin American jurisdictions debating similar provisions — Argentina, Colombia, and Chile have considered aligned legislation.

Practical implications

For organizations operating in Mexico:

  • AI service providers: consent verification is essential; creation without consent for identifiable persons carries criminal risk.
  • Platforms: takedown obligations under the federal reforms combined with state-level Olimpia enforcement.
  • Political campaigns: INE labeling requirements must be followed; penalties include electoral-period takedown orders.

Sources