Deepfake Law in Italy
Italy regulates deepfakes through the EU AI Act and Garante (data protection authority) enforcement. Dedicated deepfake legislation is in development; existing privacy and defamation law covers most use cases.
- Status
- enacted
- Jurisdiction
- Italy
- Effective
- Feb 2026
- Statute
- EU AI Act + Codice Penale arts. 494, 595, 600-ter
Italy regulates deepfakes primarily through the EU AI Act and existing provisions of the Penal Code, with active enforcement by the Garante (data protection authority). A dedicated deepfake statute has been in parliamentary debate through 2024–2025 but has not yet been enacted.
Key provisions
EU AI Act. Directly applicable; AGCOM and the Garante share supervisory responsibilities depending on context.
Penal Code Article 494 — Substitution of persona. Criminalizes impersonation for gain or injury. Applied to deepfake-enabled fraud and impersonation cases. Penalties up to one year.
Penal Code Article 595 — Defamation. Covers deepfakes attributing false statements or actions to real persons. Aggravated forms (via press, repeated) carry up to six years.
Penal Code Article 600-ter (child sexual abuse material). Explicitly includes AI-generated CSAM; penalties up to twelve years.
Italian GDPR implementation (Dlgs. 196/2003). Garante enforces against unauthorized use of biometric or personal data in synthetic media.
Garante enforcement
The Garante has been among the most active European DPAs on AI:
- 2023 temporary ban on ChatGPT for data-protection concerns (lifted after OpenAI compliance changes).
- Ongoing guidance on generative-AI use and personal data.
- Active investigations into deepfake services operating in or accessible from Italy.
Practical implications
For organizations operating in Italy:
- AI service providers: Garante scrutiny on data-processing practices is intense. Compliance review before launch in Italy is essential.
- Platforms: cooperation with Garante takedown requests is expected.
- Enterprises: combined AI Act + GDPR + Penal Code exposure.
Italy is often described as a "watchful" rather than "aggressive" enforcer — significant regulatory action but fewer criminal prosecutions than Germany or Spain.